Click poster to enlarge | Download form here

iPhone 4 has an antenna problem.
iPhone 5 should be improved in that aspect.
But will it have a new problem?
iPad 1 has its limitations.
iPad 2 should have less.
But what limitations will remain?
Always a beta version,
Life is likewise in beta… a work in progress…
If we can always can become better… till we become alpha, the best.

A Tit for a Tat (164)
Tit: Right now, there is a pink elephant in the room!
Tat: …
Tit: Well? Isn’t there?
Tat: There was one just now, but not right now!
Previous aT4aT: http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/09/liars-paradox
About aT4aT: http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/02/logo-for-a-tit-for-a-tat-series
Liar’s Paradox
By shian on 2 Sep 2010 under Odds & Ends |
Your Comment | Tags: paradox, perception, truth
A Tit for a Tat (163)
Tit: Look! Says here – ‘This sentence is false’.
Tat: That’s meaningless!
Tit: Why?
Tat: If it’s false, it’s true; if it’s true, it’s false!
Tit: True… I mean false…
Tat: Whatever!
Next aT4aT: http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/09/pink-elephant-now
Previous aT4aT: http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/09/harder-to-forget
About aT4aT: http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/02/logo-for-a-tit-for-a-tat-series
A Living Without Killing?
By shian on 2 Sep 2010 under Comics & Graphic Novels, Vegetarianism & Veganism |
Your Comment | Tags: karma, precepts
Q: Does a meat-seller (not a butcher), say a chicken rice hawker break the First Precept of not killing? He doesn’t kill any chicken though he buys dead chickens from a butcher. What about a poultry-seller who sells live chickens for customers to slaughter by themselves?
A: Technically, the meat-seller does not break the First Precept. However, his trade involves meat, which is considered wrong livelihood under the Noble Eightfold Path. It’s simple why – because his business demands continual killing. The live chicken-seller also does not technically break the First Precept but it also practises wrong livelihood as it involves continual exploitation of sentient lives. The unwholesome karma created in either cases is not any less grave than breaking the First Precept – especially over a long duration of time – because these occupations support killing quite directly.
Not a Reason to Abort
By shian on 2 Sep 2010 under Odds & Ends |
Your Comment | Tags: karma, precepts, rebirth, suffering
Q: Abortion is against the First Precept of not killing. But due to great advance in medical science, doctors are now able to tell whether a child will be born physically or mentally disabled. In such cases, is it better to abort the child, as bringing the child into this world will not only make him/her suffer, but will also bring suffering to the parents. What is the Buddhist view on this?
A: Even if a child is born deformed or disabled in some way, s/he should be given born to and to be loved – because the human rebirth is relatively very difficult to come by, as a golden opportunity to learn and practise the Dharma. The child should be exposed to the Dharma with as much compassion as possible; not disposed of. It is a mistake to assume we can definitely end the misery of the child (and parents) by abortion, because the child might still be handicapped in the next life if the unexhausted negative karma continues – which is much more likely than not.
Dissuading Against Shark-fin Consumption
By shian on 2 Sep 2010 under Vegetarianism & Veganism |
Your Comment | Tags: empathy, sincerity
There was a discussion with friends from Vegetarian Society over coverage of boycotting shark-fin soup for wedding dinners in the news… about whether it involves etiquette in rejecting invitations that include the dish and speaking against the dish during such dinners. Here is my reply:
It’s all very simple, methinks… We just need to sincerely look in the eyes of the shark-fin orderers and eaters, and in the most heartfelt but gentle manner, describe the suffering the sharks go through, as it is, and let them decide if shark-fin is still palatable. Nothing to worry about etiquette :-] If we express our empathy for the sharks sincerely, it’s more moving and transformational than anything else… other than personal witness of the suffering. Perhaps the couple can even give say a few words on this during the wedding. Best effects if the cam zooms in on them slightly teary-eyed!
Related Article:
Celebrate with Kindness
http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/03/celebrate-with-kindness

A Tit for a Tat (162)
Tit: He just told me to remind him to do that. But it’s forgetful him telling forgetful me to remind him! Can I ask you to remind us?
Tat: Oh sure… if you remind me to remind you! Just kidding. Now that three of us know, it’ll be harder for us to forget!
Tit: Yes, good. If all of us forget, it’ll be something so amazing that we probably won’t forget it!
Next aT4aT: http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/09/liars-paradox
Previous aT4aT: http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/08/an-estranged-dream
About aT4aT: http://moonpointer.com/new/2010/02/logo-for-a-tit-for-a-tat-series
Transformation by Power of Goodness
By shian on 2 Sep 2010 under Odds & Ends |
Your Comment | Tags: goodness, merits
Y: I need to minimise my contact with him… to save my sanity, preserve myself, to prevent good vibes from being drained away for nothing and save my good energy for more constructive work.
V: Hey, don’t be disheartened… What I do is whenever I do good, I dedicate the goodness to my family, hoping that it will transform their minds to goodness. You could try, I do see results, though it’s gradual.
S: Here’s a simple way to dedicate merits:
May the good I have done today,
be shared with all beings.
May all beings be well and happy.
May these merits also benefit him.
May he become kinder and wiser.
It’s important not to, even in your mind, alienate him – because this kind of lessens your karmic affinity with him. What needed is gentle transformation of the negativity in the affinity.
Everything has Its Consequences
By shian on 25 Aug 2010 under Movies/TV |
Your Comment | Tags: guilt, karma
Something learnt from ‘American Pie: The Naked Mile’
is that there is no such thing as a guilt-free trip without consequences..
even if others offer you a chance to take one,
even if you give yourself a chance to take one,
because everyone has the propensity of guilt,
because everything done has its consequences.
That’s probably the shortest but gravest review
of an instalment in the comedy franchise ever!




























