The Unseen ‘Ip Man’ Behind Bruce Lee?
http://buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=12,7663,0,0,1,0
The mild-mannered ‘Ip Man’ (pronounced ‘eep-mun’: Bruce Lee’s martial arts master) is a refreshing break from the typical genre of screen Kung Fu heroes. Come to think of it, Ip Man is in many ways the direct opposite of Bruce Lee’s famous brash screen personas. Then again, what we witness in the film ‘Ip Man’ is just another screen persona played by an actor too? Instead of being hot-headed or fantastically fancy in pugilistic moves, Ip Man is disarmingly humble. He is so unassuming during most of the featured fights that he almost takes the fight out of fighting. Yet, he who wins with minimal or even no violence is a true victor indeed. Unlike the norm of the day, when arrogant pugilists challenge one another to prove themselves, Ip Man even hesitates to take up challenges deemed unnecessary, often politely turning them down.
Ip Man earns much respect by giving respect – even to those who lose in sparring matches with him, who were not really respectful enough of him in the first place. He neither gloats about winning or condemns the losers. Because the losers realise that he had graciously and unconditionally given them much leeway and face, they are greatly humbled by his magnanimity. Buddhists would see Ip Man to be masterful with the practice of maintaining an ‘ordinary mind’ – the attitude that does not make a big deal out of the shifty worldly winds – whether they blow his way or others’. These winds are after all but winds of change, of alternating praise and blame, gain and loss, fame and shame, pain and pleasure. A true hero must not just be a physical one – he must be a spiritual victor too. Even a gracious loser ultimately ‘defeats’ an arrogant ‘winner’!
The arrogant is always haughty too soon – though there is never really a good time to be haughty. The winner of a prize is not always the winner of peace! Arrogance is a defilement that invites enemies who might be haughtier than oneself! It also humiliates the losers, readily transforming them into potential enemies. Such is the trouble with being obsessed with dualistic victory and defeat – on both sides. The Buddha couldn’t have put it any better when he warned thus in the Dhammapada – ‘Victory begets enmity. The defeated dwell in pain. Happily the peaceful live, discarding both victory and defeat.‘ Even if it is not possible to totally discard all forms of victory and defeat in this competitive world, one should train to be able to win while winning any cockiness in oneself, to lose without losing confidence in oneself. Even if the world competes with you, one need not compete with it. Any gains or losses are just impermanent and unsubstantial by-products.
Facing guns held by an oppressive regime, what good can a martial artist do with his skills? How can he fight for justice? By not doing it alone if he can help it – but by inspiring the masses to stand up together. The odds will always be against the lone hero – but real heroes are the ones able to urge more to be heroic. In his war-torn homeland, Ip Man trains the ones he could to at least be able to defend themselves. How obsolete, one might think, martial arts are, in the face of guns. Then again, doesn’t it offer the most fundamental physical defense? How can this skill ever be outdated? The enemies are not always armed too, while a good martial artist can disarm the armed! Anyway, martial arts are commonly practised as a form of discipline, exercise and art. When taught with honourable ethics, they can be a skilful means of imparting spirituality too. Just think Buddhism-inspired Shaolin Kung Fu.
The movie however, does show a scene where Ip Man becomes wrathful during sparring sessions with soldiers of the enemy – when he realised how his fellow countrymen were unjustly sacrificed. Nationalistic pride can be dangerous – both for the antagonists and the antagonised. One has to be mindful not to let personal pride well up collectively with others’ to become explosive nationalistic pride. Ironically, while countries can go to war due to such pride, wars can also be ceased by them – though at a price. Is it alright to be wrathful when we encounter great injustice, when much is at stake? It is – only when it is a skilful manifestation of wrath without genuine rage. With real anger, one would be the first engulfed by its fire. Provoked by the heat of the moment, what we do in such rashness is unlikely to be wise or beneficial. In a showdown duel with the main enemy, Ip Man pulls back his possibly fatal coup de grace when he realises this. Not becoming ruthless like the enemy, he remains the hero. As taught by the Buddha, also in the Dhammapada, ‘Greater than one who wins a hundred battles, is one who conquers oneself.’
Related Article:
A ‘Fearless’ Lesson on True Victory (Huo Yuanjia)
http://buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=12,2359,0,0,1,0
“Ip Man earns much respect by giving respect”, this is an important quality thqt we should really learn from him.
I also admire his ability to “downgrade” as a labourer when he saw the need to. However, he was also initially hesitant to work for the factory boss whom he had helped before…
“In a showdown duel with the main enemy, Ip Man pulls back his possibly fatal coup de grace when he realises this.”
I didn’t catch this, I thought the enemy was already quite badly beaten and as good as lifeless though the enemy was trying to be fair in his fight. It was the 2nd-in-command who had been the culprit in arousing all these heat but hiding behind the shadow of the commander who had been a considerably fair person.
This is like in life, in work, there could be middle management making some wrong decisions but the superior being responsible for the staff, has to shoulder the responsibility. Could such cases be considered bearing debts/karma of one’s pasts to the employee?
And of course, there are also cases when the top pushes responsiblity of error to the lower level staff…
What’s the Buddhist viewpoint of such entangled relationship?
Re: ‘I didn’t catch this, I thought the enemy was already quite badly beaten and as good as lifeless though the enemy was trying to be fair in his fight.’
Reply: But there is still a difference – between delivering the deathblow versus not. What is a fair fight in war with guns all around? Fairness would be not going to war in the first place to oppress the innocent, to somehow create a contrived and needless duel.
Re: ‘It was the 2nd-in-command who had been the culprit in arousing all these heat but hiding behind the shadow of the commander who had been a considerably fair person.’
Reply: Am not sure if that bit was to make the story politically sensitive – by pushing blame to a ‘third-party enemy’. Anyway, a fair person wouldn’t be a leader in an offensive war. And the general already knew his subordinate was a sneaky trigger-happy fella.
Re: ‘This is like in life, in work, there could be middle management making some wrong decisions but the superior being responsible for the staff, has to shoulder the responsibility. Could such cases be considered bearing debts/karma of one’s pasts to the employee? And of course, there are also cases when the top pushes responsiblity of error to the lower level staff… What’s the Buddhist viewpoint of such entangled relationship?’
Reply: However, good upper mgmt would point out the faults of the middle too – to urge the involved to pull up their socks. If not, the upper mgmt is not very good. Likewise, good upper mgmt would admit its faults and not push blame to lower mgmt. Karma can be collectively created and thus be entangled between individuals in cause and effect. What matters is not so much to keep pointing fingers at one another, but to use compassion and wisdom to urge all to work cohesively for the greater good that is dependent upon all parties. :straight:
I liked the review and your replies. Thanks. I too agree that there is a lot to learn from the movie Ip Man. I had no clue about how powerful the movie is till I literally was dragged to see the show by a friend. I did not regret one bit.
The movie has a lot of karma lessons. I learnt a lot from every time the story takes a turn. Compassion for his people, taking good care of his family, respecting the opponent, praising the enemy, cool – calm and collected thinking…wow – there is a lot to learn and reflect…
And most of all it shows the qualities of grace and respect and friendship and being humble pays of huge results – BIG time.
If it were all true the sheer result of “producing” and making happen a student like Bruce Lee is the biggest reward for a guru like Ip Man. I will watch the movie again and try to reflect more. In the meanwhile thanks a lot for sharing…. 😀
Thanks for liking the stuff above. Hmmm… it’s ironical how this largely anti-violence flick is one of the best kung fu films in a while!
:bandit: < A sneaky fella - what the forthright Ip Man wasn't